Lujiazui, Shanghai's financial center, provides a stunning backdrop to the Bund. [Photo by Wang Gang/For China Daily]
Assuming that the measures US President Donald Trump has taken in the first few weeks in office reflect, a new and sustainable path for the United States, instead of whims, will they have an impact on China's economic prospects?
Before addressing this question, we should analyze the structural strengths of China, "structural" in this case being those strengths that do not depend on external factors. There are at least six such structural factors in China's favor.
First, the large size of China's domestic market guarantees low average production costs and, therefore, relatively low prices of its high-tech and heavy industrial goods and economies of scale. Hence, whether or not China has access to external markets, its enterprises can produce at competitive prices even in the most complex and large-scale sectors.
Second, according to World Bank, the savings-to-GDP ratio of China (over 44 percent) is much higher than those in most Western economies (about 18 percent in the US) and the world average (27 percent). This creates for China a large margin to increase consumption without endangering macroeconomic stability. In the face of trade conflicts, this might help mitigate the impact of declining exports on China's GDP.
Third, China has invested in high-quality education, which has helped create a very productive and adaptable labor force. An educated population can better comprehend budget constraints, the value of forfeiting short-term aspirations for long-term national strategic objectives, and the broad set of contesting factors that ought to be contemplated when drawing development policies, all of which feeds into high levels of social cohesion, a critical factor in determining the investment ratio and GDP growth.
Fourth, since ancient times China has cultivated an appetite for knowledge and technological solutions to production problems. China invented gunpowder, mechanical clocks, the compass, printing and paper, among other things. After the launch of reform and opening-up in 1978, substantive budget allocations for research and development have strengthened the quest for science, enabling the country to compete with the West in several cutting-edge fields.
Fifth, in terms of sustaining economic growth, China's political system has strengths that are not found in Western economies. The Chinese leadership is pragmatic when choosing and implementing economic policies. For instance, "what matters is that the cat catches mice, no matter black or white". Therefore, the leadership can and is willing to pick from a whole array of fiscal and monetary tools and use them to achieve its goals. Besides, China's political system warrants not only social stability but also the continuity of the objectives, strategies and policies, all of which encourage private capital to invest and take risks in long-term ventures.
Finally, starting in 1840 through 1945, China endured attacks and invasions by Western powers and some neighbors. These more than 100 years of aggression, known in Chinese narrative as "the century of humiliation", are very much instilled into the Chinese psyche, affording a need for unity, self-protection and national strength, which call for hard work, sacrifice, entrepreneurship and social cohesion. This not only facilitates the work of the Communist Party of China, which played a key role in bringing to an end that "humiliation", but has also positively contributed to the competitiveness of the economy.
The West might choose to intensify its animosity toward China, ignited chiefly by economic fears, with tariff wars aimed at halting its progress, thus ignoring that China's structural-historical factors ensure the country's progress with its own dynamics and self-sustainability. True, some sources estimate China exports-GDP ratio amounts to nearly 18 percent. But if tariffs reduced its exports to 14.4 percent of GDP, though a very unlikely event, domestic consumption can easily offset it by a corresponding reduction in the savings-GDP ratio of 3.6 percentage points, bringing the savings-GDP ratio to about 41 percent, still much higher than the West's average savings rate. In such a scenario, the impact of tariffs on China's GDP would be minimal, if any, while consumption and the quality of life in China would improve.
Moreover, the new US administration's measures have, unintentionally, become a key factor in strengthening "team China". The US administration seems to have embarked on a crusade to make enemies out of friends and friends out of countries deeply discredited before the US' Western allies. Cuts in the budget of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) might prove right those who consider American capitalism highly predatory and might cause havoc in many countries and groups of people that benefited from US aid.
The revival of the outdated 19th Century' Monroe Doctrine ("America for the Americans") and the Manifest Destiny (right of the US to expand its territory) is hurting relations with countries like Denmark, Palestine, some Arab nations, Canada and Panama, and is seen as a warning by the rest of the world. The US administration's mercantilist-protectionist trade practices and threats against US friends and foes alike, stand in the way of legally binding multilateral rules and bilateral trade treaties, which were promoted, if not imposed, for decades by the very United States itself.
The US linking of tariff threats and sanctions to the US' geopolitical rivalry with China contradicts one of the core propagandistic arguments when, for instance, the Central America, Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement was being promoted.
More than just raising eyebrows, the US administration may have forced many people across the world to have second thoughts about the sincerity and real intentions of the administration and to wonder if it is not better to strengthen relations with a trade eager "no-strings-attached" China, away from a mercantilist end-justifies-any-means US.
Therefore, quite beyond the structural positive factors mentioned above, the US administration's announcements and decisions might have improved the prospects for the Chinese economy and its overall standing in the world.
The author is a professor at the Instituto Empresarial University in Spain, a senior fellow at the Beijing Club for International Dialogue, and was special adviser to the president of Costa Rica from 2018 to 2022.The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.
If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.
If you have any problems with this article, please contact us at app@chinadaily.com.cn and we'll immediately get back to you.
中新经纬2月19日电 据《华尔街日报》中文网19日报道，欧洲监管机构将对苹果公司(Apple Inc., AAPL)处以超过5亿美元的罚款，理由是这家科技巨头不公平的阻碍了其他音乐流媒体竞争对手。 《华尔街日报》中文网援引 27亿元票房领跑春节档 凭什么《热辣滚烫》？ 长沙晚报2月17日讯(全媒体记者 宁莎鸥)今年的春节档大战在如火如荼地进行中。截至17日记者发稿时，贾玲自导自演的《热辣滚烫》已获得票房超27亿元，领跑大盘，有望拿到春 中新经纬2月23日电 题：马面裙脱销背后，品牌价值尚待深挖 作者 李杰 中新经纬特约专家、山东工艺美术学院服装学院院长 近年来，汉服消费愈加火热，特别是这个春节里马面裙再次火爆出圈，无疑带动了一轮文化消费热。 中新经纬2月23日电 (王玉玲 刘雪玉)近期，美国开放人工智能研究中心(OpenAI)的文生视频大模型Sora一经推出，就引爆互联网。有业内人士认为，以Sora为首的多模态大模型，将带人类走向更超乎想象的地方。如何看待Sora的发 春节档还是挣钱的好档期吗？ 中新网北京2月23日电(记者 张曦)2024春节档已进入尾声。 如果要用一个词来形容今年的表现，无疑是“魔幻”。 一边是80.16亿创纪录的票房成绩(2024年2月10日至17日)，一边是四部电 贵州毕节：蓄势赋能谋发展 高质量推进新型工业化 中新网贵州毕节2月22日电 题：贵州毕节：蓄势赋能谋发展 高质量推进新型工业化 作者 高大涛 陈曦 中国龙年春节假期，贵州省毕节市黔西市新仁乡化屋村游人如织。 。本文链接：Why Chinese economy can navigate global headwindshttp://www.sushuapos.com/show-5-47534-0.html
声明：本网站为非营利性网站，本网页内容由互联网博主自发贡献，不代表本站观点，本站不承担任何法律责任。天上不会到馅饼，请大家谨防诈骗！若有侵权等问题请及时与本网联系，我们将在第一时间删除处理。
上一篇： China's skilled workers impress on world stage
下一篇： 前瞻｜开放中国充满机遇 跨越山海普惠共赢