People visit the exhibition booth of BYD at an auto show in Xi'an, Northwest China's Shaanxi province, May 1, 2024. [Photo/Xinhua]
The US and China have been recently trading barbs over Chinese electric vehicles (EVs). The US accuses Chinese EVs of overcapacity, claiming they disrupt both the US and global markets and pose risks, including information security concerns. The US has unilaterally imposed a 100 per cent tariff rate on Chinese EVs. China, on the other hand, asserts that its EV industry represents advanced capacity that helps combat climate change and promote global green transition, and accuses Washington of undermining fair and free trade and competition.
The fierce debate between the two major countries mirrors past disputes. Similar to today's EV dispute, there was an incident regarding gasoline-powered vehicles in the early 20th century.
When gasoline-powered automobiles first hit the market, they were costly and produced in limited numbers, making them a luxury exclusive to the wealthy. Ford Motor Company transformed the industry by introducing standardization and assembly line production, which significantly reduced manufacturing costs and boosted production. This innovation led to a substantial decrease in prices, making cars affordable and accessible to the masses. Despite strong opposition from luxury car brands and their interest groups, the Ford Model T, known for its quality and affordability, quickly gained widespread popularity globally. Ford's pioneering production techniques helped the company overcome various challenges, spurred technological advancement and increased revenue across the automotive supply chain. It also revolutionized people's modes of transportation and transformed the automotive industry and related sectors.
Throughout history, similar debates have arisen over emerging capacities, with Ford's automotive revolution being perhaps the best known one. In essence, these debates represent the clash between progress and conservatism, between the advanced and the outdated. In many ways, the history of human civilization is a history of the adoption of advanced capacity.
The popularization and transfer of advanced capacity have often led to clashes with outdated capacity and its interest groups. But not all stories have a happy ending as Ford did.
In the 1980s, Japan's semiconductor industry rapidly expanded its global market share with world-leading manufacturing and design capabilities, posing a significant threat to American semiconductor producers who used to dominate the market. Obsessed with their dominant position, these American companies lobbied the US government to label Japan as setting "structural barriers", and to impose high punitive tariffs on Japanese semiconductors. By inflating the prices of Japanese products, the US firms reclaimed their market share through non-market approaches. Unfortunately, Japan failed to defend its own interests or seek resolution through the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), nor did global buyers unite to support Japan's semiconductor producers. As a result, the advance of the semiconductor industry was stunted, and international trade was used more and more as a weapon, warping the global industrial and supply chains.
Stories of Ford and Japan's semiconductor industry show that current suppression on Chinese EVs is essentially a confrontation between advanced capacity and entrenched interests.
Ford's success proves that advanced capacity is bound to outcompete the outdated forces and gain wider support since it drives industrial advancement and benefits the people. By contrast, the decline of Japan's semiconductor industry tells us that advanced capabilities are likely to be crippled under the pretext of "overcapacity" if no action is taken. Outdated capacity does not phase out naturally. Progress can prevail only through concerted efforts.
Chinese EVs, representing green energy and smart technologies, will help tackle climate change and bring a better life to the people. To better meet demands of people from all countries, more and cheaper Chinese EVs are needed. This also requires us to extend stronger support to Chinese EVs in a more open way. Such support is not for China only, but for every one of us and for human advancement as a whole.
2024春节档：史上最火，史上最“卷” 羊城晚报记者 李丽 据国家电影局统计数据，2024年春节档总票房80.16亿元，在观影人次、场次和票房3个维度创造影史最高纪录。 过去10年间，看电影逐渐成为中国人过年的新民俗 春节假期武铁发送旅客511万人次 中新网武汉2月18日电 (记者 张芹)记者18日从中国铁路武汉局集团有限公司(以下简称“武铁”)获悉，2024年春节假期，武铁共发送旅客511万人次。1月26日至2月17日，武铁共发送旅客1273. 买买买！去年中国奢侈品市场达到6077亿元，约占全球22% 中国消费者“点燃”奢侈品市场 羊城晚报记者 陈泽云 中国人“买买买”奢侈品的热情和实力又回归了！ 近日，全球最大奢侈品巨头LVMH发布了2023年全年 国产手机为什么一机难求 手机市场高质量供给不仅能满足不断升级的消费需求，还能激发消费升级意愿，释放新的发展动能。拥有与时俱进的创新力，培育更多新质生产力，国产手机乃至中国制造才能更有竞争力。 近日，多家 冲上热搜！瑞幸9.9元咖啡有重大变化 每经记者 杨昕怡 每经编辑 卢祥勇 刘雪梅 瑞幸似乎不再恋战。 近日，当节后复工的上班族们想点一杯咖啡“续命”时，意外发现瑞幸9.9元优惠券的可使用范围大幅缩水。“ 激活公共数据要素潜能 日前，国家数据局等部门发布《“数据要素×”三年行动计划(2024―2026年)》，进一步明确和细化了激活数据要素潜能的具体方式和实践场景，扩展数据要素的高质量供给。将通过多领域、多行业的试 。本文链接：Chinese electric vehicles: Overcapacity or advanced capacity?http://www.sushuapos.com/show-5-25258-0.html
声明：本网站为非营利性网站，本网页内容由互联网博主自发贡献，不代表本站观点，本站不承担任何法律责任。天上不会到馅饼，请大家谨防诈骗！若有侵权等问题请及时与本网联系，我们将在第一时间删除处理。
上一篇： GLOBALink | China Explorers: British couple falls in love with Chinese bubble tea
下一篇： 多部国家级非遗舞剧在新疆喀什上演